Hawaii Marine Corps Base - Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Environmental Assessment Report (Revised Draft)
A detailed environmental impact assessment and alternative analysis for the U.S. Naval Air Reserve - Squadron's project to construct a dedicated aircraft maintenance hangar at the Kaneohe Bay base in Hawaii.
Detail
Published
22/12/2025
Key Chapter Title List
- Executive Summary (Including Proposed Action, Purpose and Need, Evaluation of Alternatives, Summary of Environmental Resource Assessment, Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures, Public Participation)
- Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action (Including Project Background, VR-51 Squadron Mission, Scope of Environmental Analysis, Relevant Laws and Regulations, Public and Agency Involvement, Required Permits)
- Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives (Including Screening Factors, Alternatives to be Analyzed, Alternatives Not Considered for Detailed Analysis, Best Management Practices and Protective Measures)
- Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences (Including Air Quality, Water Resources, Biological Resources, Natural Hazards and Resilience, Cultural Resources, Infrastructure, Hazardous Materials and Waste, Noise)
- Cumulative Impact Analysis (Including Cumulative Effects for Each Resource Area)
- Summary and Conclusions of Impacts for the Proposed Action and Alternatives
- Consistency with Federal Policies and Executive Orders
- List of Consulting and Coordinating Agencies
- List of Report Preparers
- References
- Appendices (Including Public Comments and Responses, NHPA Section 106 Consultation, ESA Section 7 Consultation, CZMA Coordination, Air Emissions Calculation Tables, Noise Study)
Document Introduction
This report is a revised draft Environmental Assessment prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and its implementing regulations, the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction 5090.1, and Marine Corps Order 5090.2, Volume 12. The core subject of the report is to assess the potential environmental impacts of constructing a new dedicated maintenance hangar and its associated aircraft parking apron for the U.S. Navy Reserve's VR-51 Squadron's C-40A aircraft within the Marine Corps Base Hawaii (MCBH) Kaneohe Bay area. Although the VR-51 Squadron completed its transition from the C-20G to the C-40A aircraft in 2019, this assessment not only covers the impacts of C-40A operations but focuses more on the direct and indirect environmental consequences that may arise from the construction of the new hangar and related infrastructure itself.
The report first clarifies the necessity of the project: the currently utilized Hangar 104 cannot accommodate the C-40A for maintenance and storm protection due to insufficient clear height, forcing the squadron to frequently conduct long-distance flights to other bases for maintenance, resulting in operational inefficiencies and increased costs. To address this, the report establishes strict geographical and functional screening criteria. Based on these, two action alternatives (the preferred alternative of reconstructing on the Hangar 104 site and the alternative of new construction in the Green Area) and one no-action alternative are proposed for comparative analysis. The assessment covers a comprehensive range of resource areas, including eight key aspects: air quality, water resources, biological resources, natural hazards and resilience, cultural resources, infrastructure, noise, and hazardous materials and waste. Areas considered to have negligible impacts, such as geology, land use, airspace, transportation, and socioeconomics, were not analyzed in detail.
In the environmental impact analysis section, the report systematically evaluates the affected environment and environmental consequences for each resource area under the two action alternatives. The overall conclusion indicates that the environmental impacts of both action alternatives are below significant levels in most areas. For example, construction period emissions are below regulatory thresholds; impacts on water resources are manageable through the implementation of Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development techniques; through the integration of a series of stringent protective measures (such as specific lighting standards, bird strike prevention design, construction timing restrictions, etc.) and following informal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, impacts on species listed under the Endangered Species Act are considered negligible or extremely unlikely. However, regarding cultural resources, if construction proceeds on the original Hangar 104 site (the preferred alternative), adverse effects would occur due to the demolition of this historic structure, which is a contributing element to the Kaneohe Bay Naval Air Station Aviation Historic District, and impacts on the adjacent National Historic Landmark District landscape. The Navy is currently consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer and other relevant parties on this matter, intending to develop and implement mitigation measures (such as preparing a Historic Structures Report, developing a digital interactive application, etc.) through a signed Memorandum of Agreement to reduce the impacts to a level below significant. The conclusion of the Noise Study appendix notes that although the noise from a single C-40A flight is higher than that of the former C-20G, the total number of operations has not increased, resulting in negligible impact on the cumulative noise environment.
Finally, through cumulative impact analysis, the report considers this project within the broader context of multiple concurrent and future military construction projects at MCBH (such as MQ-9 and KC-130J squadron facility construction, barracks modernization, wastewater treatment plant upgrades, the establishment of the 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment, etc.). It concludes that the addition of this project will not lead to significant cumulative adverse effects. Synthesizing all analyses, the report finds that implementing either action alternative would not result in significant adverse environmental impacts, providing a basis for subsequently issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact. This revised draft will be open for another 30-day public comment period from March 8 to April 7, 2025.