Russian Military Performance and Prospects
Based on the assessment of the war situation over the years, this analysis evaluates the resilience, attrition, and restructuring challenges of the Russian military system, as well as its long-term impact on the security of the United States and Europe.
Detail
Published
22/12/2025
Key Chapter Title List
- Command and Control
- Personnel Status
- Casualty Situation
- Recruitment and Mobilization
- Equipment and Ammunition
- Current Military Performance and Outlook
- Defense Industry and Production
- Tactical Adjustments and Combat Operations
- External Support and Supply Chain
- U.S. Policy and Congressional Considerations
Document Introduction
This report, prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) of the United States, aims to provide a professional assessment for legislative debate regarding Russia's military performance in the Ukraine war and its future capabilities. Based on developments in the war situation from the full-scale invasion in February 2022 to early 2025, the report systematically analyzes the structural and tactical reasons why the Russian military, despite advantages in troop numbers and defense industrial potential, has failed to decisively defeat the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
The report provides an in-depth analysis of the multidimensional challenges faced by the Russian military. At the command and control level, despite attempts at reform, the Russian military maintains a Soviet-style centralized command system, leading to tactical rigidity and high casualties. In May 2024, President Putin appointed former economic official Andrey Belousov as Defense Minister, seen as a key signal of treating the war as a long-term challenge and emphasizing the management of economic and defense industrial resources. Regarding personnel, the report cites U.S. estimates as of April 2025, suggesting Russian military casualties may be as high as 790,000 to 900,000, with significant losses among experienced soldiers and junior officers, creating an erosive effect on the force's long-term effectiveness.
In terms of force replenishment, Russia maintains a monthly recruitment rate of approximately 30,000 through high signing bonuses, coercive measures, and stop-loss policies, but the problem of inadequate training is prominent. Equipment losses are also massive, with over 3,000 tanks destroyed. In response, Russia has mobilized its economy to a wartime state, planning to allocate 40% of the 2025 federal budget to military and security sectors, with defense spending expected to account for 7.2% of GDP. Its defense production primarily focuses on refurbishing old equipment rather than manufacturing new models and heavily relies on critical components, drones, and ammunition supplies from China, Iran, and North Korea.
Currently, Russian military operations remain concentrated in eastern Ukraine, relying on firepower and numerical superiority to wage a war of attrition. However, the artillery advantage ratio has decreased from 10:1 in early 2024 to 1.5-2:1 in early 2025. Tactically, the Russian military has made adjustments, including focusing on small-unit assaults, upgrading communication systems, improving artillery targeting, and increasing the use of drones, glide bombs, and electronic warfare. It has also repeatedly adapted its logistics to Ukraine's enhanced long-range strike capabilities following Western aid.
The report concludes by noting that although the Trump administration has pushed for negotiation efforts to end the war, Russian military operations and long-range strikes continue. Some members of the U.S. Congress are calling for further sanctions against Russia's defense industry and military leadership and express concern about the Russian military's potential for reconstitution and the long-term threat it poses to U.S. and European security interests. This assessment provides a crucial basis for policymakers to analyze the war situation, evaluate the effectiveness of sanctions, and consider further assistance to Ukraine.