Files / Russia

Rubio Hearing: Supporting Ukraine's Resistance Against Russian Aggression

Based on the testimony of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee nomination hearing, analyze the geopolitical background of the Ukraine crisis, the basis for U.S. aid policies, and future policy recommendations (Year Month)

Detail

Published

22/12/2025

Key Chapter Title List

  1. Testimony Background and Acknowledgments
  2. Historical and Strategic Context of the Ukraine Crisis
  3. Global Security Implications of Russian Aggression
  4. Response and Assistance from the United States and Its Allies
  5. International Dimensions of the Conflict and the Axis of Aggressors
  6. Core U.S. Interests and Strategic Obligations
  7. List of Policy Recommendations for the United States
  8. Ukraine's Future and NATO Membership
  9. Conclusion: The Strategic Value of Supporting Ukraine

Document Introduction

This report is based on the complete text of the testimony delivered by the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA) at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing for Secretary of State nominee Marco A. Rubio on January 15, 2025. As an umbrella organization with an 85-year history representing the interests of over 2 million Ukrainian Americans, UCCA's testimony systematically presents the Ukrainian-American community's stance, rationale, and specific policy demands regarding continued U.S. support for Ukraine's resistance against Russia's full-scale invasion.

The report begins by establishing its core argument: a strong, democratic, and independent Ukraine aligns with U.S. national security interests and is consistent with America's tradition of supporting individual liberty and self-determination. The testimony reviews the history of aggression, from Russia's initial invasion of Crimea and the Donbas in 2014 to its launch of a full-scale war in 2022 aimed at preventing Ukraine's integration into the Euro-Atlantic community. The report analyzes Russia's war within a broader global security framework, arguing that its implementation of a "Russian World" imperial policy and its multi-vector destabilization campaign against NATO constitute the most severe threat to the rules-based international order since World War 2.

The testimony provides a detailed assessment of the United States' leading role since the conflict's outbreak, including sanctions against Russia and the provision of over 60 billion dollars in security assistance to Ukraine. The report emphasizes that such aid is not only vital for Ukraine's survival but also acknowledges Ukraine's geostrategic importance within the global security landscape, while yielding strategic benefits by revitalizing the U.S. domestic defense industrial base. The report further reveals the international dimensions of the conflict, identifying China—through its "no-limits" partnership and substantial support for Russia's defense industrial base—as a critical enabler of Russia's war effort. Iran provides direct military support with ballistic missiles and thousands of Shahed drones, while signs of potential involvement by North Korean forces indicate the conflict's further internationalization, forming an increasingly potent axis of aggressors.

Based on this analysis, the report asserts that a Russian victory in Ukraine would embolden China's actions in the Indo-Pacific and encourage global nuclear proliferation. Consequently, the current cost of supporting Ukraine is far lower than the future price of defending democratic values. The core section of the testimony presents a series of specific policy recommendations for the United States. These include designating Russia as a State Sponsor of Terrorism, ensuring continued security assistance through supplemental appropriations or the National Defense Authorization Act, intensifying sanctions on Russia's energy and financial sectors, utilizing frozen Russian sovereign assets for Ukraine's reconstruction, recognizing Russia's current war and historical atrocities as genocide, advancing Ukraine's path to NATO membership, and pressuring China over its support for Russia's war machine.

In conclusion, the report summarizes that Ukraine's victory carries profound geostrategic implications for the global order. Compromising with authoritarian aggression would embolden autocratic regimes worldwide and endanger freedom movements. Conversely, a decisive Ukrainian victory serves as a powerful affirmation of the durability and vitality of democratic values. For the United States, supporting Ukraine aligns with its broader strategic interests of upholding the rules-based international order and preventing the rise of revisionist powers. It is an investment in a stable, secure, and democratic world.