Files / United States

List of U.S. Department of Defense suppliers with contract amounts exceeding $1 million.

Compiled based on data from the Federal Procurement Data System for the fiscal year, this serves as a reference for fiscal year usage, covering a wide range of supplier entities from major defense contractors to emerging technology enterprises.

Detail

Published

19/01/2026

Key Chapter Title List

  1. (RC) 2 PHARMA CONNECT L.L.C.
  2. '@MIRE, INC.
  3. 1 A DEFENSE, LLC
  4. 1 ACORD SERVICES, LLC
  5. 1 HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC
  6. 1 MISSION PARTNERS
  7. 1 SOURCE SOLUTIONS CO, LLC
  8. 1 SOURCE SOLUTIONS GROUP LLC
  9. 1 SYNC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
  10. 100 WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS, LLC
  11. 10-31 INCORPORATED
  12. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES

Document Introduction

This document is an official supplier directory compiled and periodically updated by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD). Its core function is to list all supplier entities that received contract awards exceeding $25,000 in the previous fiscal year (FY 2024). The directory aims to provide an authoritative and up-to-date reference for DOD procurement activities during the 2025 calendar year (CY 2025) and beyond, ensuring transparency and compliance in the procurement process, and serving as foundational data for internal audits, market analysis, and supply chain risk assessment.

The content is strictly generated based on official records from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS), ensuring the authority and accuracy of the data source. FPDS is the U.S. government's central database for recording all federal contract actions, and its data is the cornerstone for analyzing government spending, contractor market share, and industry trends. This revised edition of the directory is marked as revised in March 2025, reflecting the DOD's ongoing tracking of supplier dynamics and information update mechanisms, which capture the fluidity of the supply chain and the emergence of new entrants.

In terms of structure, the directory lists supplier names in alphanumeric order, forming the main body of the document. The scope of inclusion is extremely broad, encompassing not only traditional large system integrators like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman (whose names appear in subsequent lists), but also a vast number of small and medium-sized enterprises, specialized service companies, research and development institutions, and emerging technology firms. The industries involved are all-encompassing, ranging from aerospace manufacturing (e.g., AAR MANUFACTURING, INC.), information technology and cybersecurity (e.g., 1 SYNC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 3RD EYE TECHNOLOGIES INC.), biomedicine and medical devices (e.g., ABBOTT LABORATORIES INC., 10X GENOMICS, INC.), to construction, logistics, training, professional consulting, and even daily material supply support services.

This directory holds multiple values for defense research and policy analysis. Firstly, it is a key window for observing the composition and health of the U.S. Defense Industrial Base (DIB). By analyzing the number, type distribution, and new entrants among suppliers, researchers can assess the breadth, depth, innovative vitality, and potential single points of failure risk within the defense supply chain. Secondly, the directory provides raw data for tracking partners under non-traditional procurement mechanisms like Other Transaction Authority (OTA) and identifying commercial technology companies involved in defense technology innovation (e.g., ABCELLERA BIOLOGICS INC, ABL SPACE SYSTEMS COMPANY). Finally, it is an indispensable starting point for conducting contractor market concentration analysis and studying the network relationships between prime contractors and subcontractors.

Although this document itself does not contain detailed information such as specific contract amounts, military service affiliation, project names, or statements of work, as a verified master list of suppliers, it lays a solid data foundation for subsequent in-depth supply chain mapping, contractor performance evaluation, geopolitical risk analysis (e.g., dependence on specific raw material or technology sources), and competitiveness analysis. For professionals focused on U.S. defense budget flows, industrial policy, and the national security procurement ecosystem, this is a foundational document of high reference value.